Bill Lehr

jobi@collector.org

© 14 APR 2004

 

The Many Faces of the Die 12 Forgeries

 

Die 12 is the 1˘ blue, bust of Benjamin Franklin facing right, 5 rayed star die with a period after postage, from the 1861 Nesbitt second printings.  There are ten working die varieties of Die 12.  The working dies can be divided into three classes based upon where the front of the bust points.

 

         

Class 1                        Class 2                        Class 3

 

Class 1:  front of the bust points at the “G” of ‘POSTAGE”

Class 2:  front of the bust points between the “A” and the “G” of “POSTAGE”

Class 3:  front of the bust points at the “A” of “POSTAGE”

 

All genuine, original printings of Die 12 envelopes occur on buff laid paper with the exception of a working die type 9 which is also printed on orange wove paper.  Wrappers were printed on white, buff, salmon buff, yellow buff, dark manila and light manila laid paper.  Wrappers are known on orange wove paper.  The source of cut squares, envelope or wrapper, can be determined by examining the laid lines:  diagonal laid lines indicates an envelope; horizontal or vertical laid lines indicates a wrapper.

 

Reprints of the Nesbitt second printings were produced in 1865.  The reprints are on white or buff, vertically laid or wove paper and exist as cut squares only.  A reprint of the 1˘ on buff has been chronicled but not verified.  The Thorp-Bartels Century Edition reports no reprints of the 1˘ star dies.  However, the current (2nd) edition of the UPSS Catalog of the 19th Century Stamped Envelopes, Wrappers, Cut Squares and Full Corners of the United States contains no mention of reprints being made of any Nesbitt second printings.

 

Die 12 appears to have been quite popular with forgers, appearing to exist in at least twelve varieties which are described below.  All of the forgeries described below have been physically examined by the author with the exception of T1-2.1, T1-3.1, and T2-1.4.


 

Die 12 Type 1 Forgeries

 

Type 1 forgeries of Die 12 are quite well known.  The six-rayed stars are the most obvious distinguishing feature of the Type 1 forgeries. 

 

Common Characteristics of Die 12T1 Forgeries:

           

            Six-rayed stars.

            Wide spacing between “O” and “S” of “POSTAGE” (approximately 1 mm.).

            Serif on the bottom of “T” of “POSTAGE” extends farther to the left than to the right.

            Upper lip of Franklin protrudes.

            Printed and embossed in some variety of blue ink on white or buff wove paper

 

Die 12FGT1-1 (bust points at the “G” of ‘POSTAGE”) Types:

 

            None of the type 1 forgeries examined, to date, fit this class.

 

Die 12FGT1-2 (bust points between the “A” and the “G” of “POSTAGE”) Types:

 

Die 12FGT1-2.2

 

T1-2.1 (not pictured) clear lettering; upper lip protrudes markedly; tip of the nose is quite pointed; head leans severely forward: known on both white and buff wove paper.  Production of this forgery is attributed to Engelhardt Fohl of Dresden, Germany.  This forgery is depicted in Linn’s Focus on Forgeries # 336, text by Varo Tyler.

 

T1-2.2 clear lettering; nose sharply pointed; hair poorly defined; chin has a dimple; head leans slightly forward; front point of the bust is flat; mouth has a downturn to the left; known on buff wove paper; overall measurement 20 ˝ X 25 mm.  Example shown is missing a piece at the top of Franklin’s head.

 

   

Die 12FGT1-2.3         Die 12FGT1-2.4

 

T1-2.3 clear lettering; cheek bone is prominent; hair is defined; bust has an upright head; known on buff wove paper; overall measurement is 20 ˝ X 25 mm.

 

T1-2.4 clear lettering; hair very clearly defined and appears as three separate sections; prominent upper lip; head leans slightly forward; known on buff wove paper; overall measurement 20 ˝ X 25 mm.

   

Die 12FGT1-2.5         Die 12FGT1-2.6

 

T1-2.5 clear lettering; point of the bust is rounded; cheek bone is prominent; hair is defined; bust has an upright head; known on white wove paper; overall measurement is 20 ˝ X 25 mm.

 

T1-2.6 clear lettering; point of the bust is pointed; bust is well embossed; upper lip protrudes least of any forgery type observed to date; known on white wove paper; overall measurement is 20 ˝ X 25 mm.

 

 

 

Die 12FGT1-3 (bust points at the “A” of “POSTAGE”) Types:

 

    

Die 12FGT1-3.1         Die 12FGT1-3.2

 

T1-3.1 coarse lettering; point of the bust is rounded and appears to point more at the “A”; hair is very clearly defined and appears as three separate sections; bust has a prominent upper lip; head leans forward; known on buff wove paper.  Example depicted has a phony block-grid killer applied.

 

T1-3.2 fairly clean lettering; “S” of “POSTAGE” is broken at both top and bottom sweeps; eye and eyelid are sharply defined; section of hair appears to be completely missing from crown to neck; known on buff wove paper.  Franklin appears to have an aura in the example pictured.


 

Die 12CF

 

The Die 12 counterfeit is printed on buff, un-watermarked laid paper but exhibits all other common characteristics of the Type 1 forgeries.  This counterfeit is known as an entire.  Overall measurement of the stamp is 20 ľ X 25 mm.  Picture shown is cropped from the entire.

 

Die 12CF

 

A Die 12 forgery matching the description of Type 1 but printed on diagonally laid, manila paper has been reported but is most likely a cut square of the counterfeit entire.

 

 

Die 12 Type 2 Forgeries

 

Type 2 forgeries of Die 12 are not as well known or as well reported as the type 1 forgeries.  The point of the bust touching the inner frame line and other overall crudeness of production are the most obvious distinguishing characteristics of this type.  There are several varieties of the Type 2 forgery, but all samples examined fall into Class 1 (bust points to the “G” of “POSTAGE”).  The Type 2 forgeries could be considered an attempt to mimic the current Die 12A (similar to Die 12 except that the bust touches the inner frame line at front and rear) but at the time these forgeries were created, Die 12A was considered to be merely a variety of Die 12.   Genuine printings of Die 12A occur only on white or on orange laid paper.

 

 

Common Characteristics of Die 12T2 Forgeries:

 

            Five-rayed stars.

            Overall production is crude; lettering and stars are poorly formed and misaligned.

            White inner and outer ovals are uneven.

            Bust misshaped; point of bust touches inner frame line at “G” of “POSTAGE”.

            “C” of “CENT” is low.

            Small white line connects the “A” and the “G” of ‘POSTAGE”.

            Printed and embossed in some variety of blue ink on white or buff wove paper.


 

Die 12FGT2-1 (bust points at the “G” of ‘POSTAGE”) Types:

 

   

Die 12FGT2-1.1         Die 12FGT2-1.2

 

T2-1.1 both stars touch inner frame line; “P” and “O” of “POSTAGE” are connected; “N” of “ONE” and the “N” of “CENT” both touch the inner frame line; bust show blurred detail; center of the “A” of “POSTAGE” is almost filled; known on buff wove paper; overall measurement 23 X 25 ˝ mm.

 

T2-1.2 right star touches inner frame line; “N” of “ONE” and the “N” of “CENT” both touch the inner frame line; “P” and “O” of  “POSTAGE” touch; “S” and “T” of “POSTAGE” are connected by a small line near the top of the letters; known on pale amber buff laid paper; overall measurement 22 X 26 mm.

 

    

Die 12FGT2-1.3         Die 12FGT2-1.4

 

T2-1.3 right star touches inner frame line; “N” of “ONE” barely touches inner frame line; “N” of “CENT” touches the inner frame line; “P” and “O” of “POSTAGE” touch; “S” and “T” of “POSTAGE” touch; known on white laid paper; overall measurement 21 ˝ X 25 ˝ mm.  Example shown was separated from a forgery of Die 14 (the combination die).

 

T2-1.4 right star touches the inner frame line; “N” of “ONE” and the “N” of “CENT” do not touch the inner frame line; “P” and “O” of “POSTAGE” and the “S” and “T’ of “POSTAGE” barely touch; chin and collar on the bust are fairly well defined.

 

NOMENCLATURE

 

Nomenclature for Die 12 forgery identification follows this format:

 

            Die #    F(or)G(ery)      Major Type      Class    Sub-variety

 

            Die #    C(ounter)F(eit)

 

SUMMARY

 

Properly speaking, forgeries should be referenced to the genuine die number.  Design, ink color and paper color may make it possible to ascribe Scott/UPSS catalog numbers to forgeries.  Paper colors were compared to reference copies of the genuine Die 12 items to aid in assigning catalog number.  The following table relates the forgeries described above to catalog numbers.

 

TYPE               1-1                   1-2.1    1-2.3    1-2.4    1-2.5    1-2.6    1-3.1    1-3.2    CF

SCOTT            unknown          U19     U19     U19     W18B  W18B  W20    W21    U19

UPSS               unknown          29        29        20        41A     41A     34        37        29

 

TYPE                                       2-1.1    2-1.2    2-1.3    2-1.4

SCOTT                                    W20    W20    W18B  U19

UPSS                                       34        34        41A     29

 

Additional varieties or paper colors may be waiting to be discovered.  The author is interested in examining any additions to the forgeries presented above.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

This study would not have been possible without the generous, extended loan of the Steve Dawson Collection of US Postal Stationery Forgeries.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

Nesbitt Stamped Envelopes & Wrappers of the United States of America with Illustrations of the Various Dies

Harrison & Bacon

Castle (as supplement to London Philatelist), 1895

 

Stamped Envelopes and Wrappers of the United States, the Nesbitt Issues 1853-1869, 1st edition

Bartels

Bartels Company, 1929

 

Thorp-Bartels Catalogue of US Stamped Envelopes, Century Edition

Thorp, Prescott Holden

Bartels Company, 1954

 

Catalog of the 19th Century US Stamped Envelopes and Wrappers of the United States, second edition

Mintz, Allen, editor

United Postal Stationery Society, Inc., 2001

 

Fake U.S. envelope entire found:  rumored to exist for a century

Haeseler, Rob

Linn’s Stamp News

Vol. 75, No. 3831, pps 1, 33

 

Who Made Such Crude Fakes of Cut Squares?

Hotchner, John M.

Linn’s Stamp News

Vol. 74, No. 3779, p6


 

Forgeries of the 19th Century US Stamped Envelopes

Kinabrew, JM, Jr.

Postal Stationery

Vol. 20, No. 4, Whole # 191, pps 115-123

 

US Envelope Die 12 Forgery Revisited

Lehr, Bill

Postal Stationery

Vol. 44, No. 3, Whole # 324, p 53

 

United States, Forgeries of the Star Die Issue Envelope Stamps

Lurch, E Norman

Postal Stationery

Vol. 4, No. 4, Whole # 72, p 49

 

Focus on Forgeries:  US 1860 1c Benjamin Franklin envelope cut square, U19

Tyler, Varro, E

Linn’s Stamp News

25 SEP, 2000, p 6, Focus on Forgeries # 336

 

Counterfeits of the Star Dies

Undersander, Dan

Postal Stationery

Vol. 42, No. 1, Whole # 310, pps 13-14

 

Fake Nesbitt cut squares came from Europe

Undersander, Dan

Linn’s Stamp News

28 AUG, 2000, p 8

 

USA Envelopes:  Reprints of the Nesbitt Issues

Undersander, Dan

Postal Stationery

Vol. 44, No. 1, Whole # 322, pps 4-6

 

Forgeries and Imitations of US Embossed Envelopes

Wells Leighton E.

Stamps

29 DEC, 1945, pps 524-525

 

Catalogue for Advanced Collectors

Collin, Henry & Calman, Henry L.

American Journal of Philately

Second Series, Vol. VII, pps 247-248